Without Henry and Fabregas, Arsenal would be average at best

revolutionfan · Apprentice

Sol Campbell is crap. Stop living in the past...

seiya · Soccer Expert

Have you seen what the games without Henry are like? Most of the time they are draws or losses, wonder if there are any statistics on this

issbill · Soccer Star

Henry out = WBA 2 Arsenal 1

Henry In = Arsenal 3 WBA 1

Does this say something???

It is well said that Chelsea's rerserves would have a stab at winning the prem

I could say Spurs could take one player out of each position and we would still be okay, for instance keane---> Defoe

Davids ---> Tainio

Dawson---> Gardner

Robbo---> Cerney

Stalteri---> Kelly

But our reserves aren't strong same as Arsenal, you take one or two of there players out and they are average, just look at the results recently

Portsmouth, Man U distintively average and arguably WBA today.

proxnet · Division 2 Novice

issbill · Soccer Star

but how often does he perform like that now days, not often, but what about the Man U at home and Man U away 0-0 and 0-2??

nakamura · Division 2 Novice

i don't think u can compare the class of spurs reserves with the likes of chelsea reserves..... they wouldn't even come close to stacking up against them. And defoe is having a bad year, he'll be lucky to make the roster for wc06.

To revfan-> i agree sol is done he's always injured or getting cards i definatly like the combo of eboue and toure back there far better...but wenger has to stick with him to make england fans happy becuz of wc06 coming up and he has been an asset to the club in the past.

Henry definatly does make a huge impact on arsenal games theres no doubt.....and thats why he's there but u can't discount arsenal as being a bad team w/o him becuz there are still numerous other great players there.

issbill · Soccer Star

How about Spurs reserves against Arsenal reserves??

Campbell missing for England would not be a big loss, we have two better Terry and King

revolutionfan · Apprentice